classpathx-crypto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Classpathx-crypto] overran shabbily


From: Claud Rosario
Subject: [Classpathx-crypto] overran shabbily
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:15:55 -0400

Revolution, Koestler seems to say, is a corrupting process.
Clearly it is apolitical book, founded on history and offering an interpretation ofdisputed events. The story ends in a blaze of respectability.
Dalis recently published LIFE comes underthis heading.
He is writing about darkness, but it isdarkness at what ought to be noon.
It is quite possiblethat mans major problems will NEVER be solved.
How do Yeats political ideas link up with his leaning towardsoccultism? Rubashov, unlike Gletkin, does not have the Revolution as hisstarting-point. Needless to say, theslaves fail to achieve it. It wouldprobably have been deadlier if it had been neater. It is not merely that power corrupts: so also do the ways of attainingpower.
There are reproductions of these all theway through the book. When he is about five he gets hold of a wounded bat which he puts into atin pail. England is lacking, therefore, in what one might call concentration-campliterature. At present Koestler seems to have none, or rather to have twowhich cancel out. Mr Menon onlydiscusses this rather shortly, but it is possible to make two guesses. Koestlers published work really centres about the Moscow trials. It is not merely that power corrupts: so also do the ways of attainingpower. But against this has to be set thefact that Dali is a draughtsman of very exceptional gifts. Itis an episode picked out from a background that does not have to bequestioned.
It mightnot, and yet Yeatss philosophy has some very sinister implications, asMr Menon points out.
I dont claim it as certain that such an experiment would havevery great results. Next morning he finds that the bat is almost dead and iscovered with ants which are devouring it.
Many of Dalis drawings are simply representationaland have a characteristic to be noted later.
Honour, he says,consists in doing what you think right.
In practice he cannot abandon the struggle. Naturally the whole book centres round one question: Why did Rubashovconfess?
Revolution, Koestler seems to say, is a corrupting process. It is quite possiblethat mans major problems will NEVER be solved.
Perhaps, however, whetherdesirable or not, it isnt possible.
The real problem is how to restore the religious attitude whileaccepting death as final. Thereforehe draws the conclusion: This is what revolutions lead to.
The Czarist officer is shocked when he learns that Rubashovintends to capitulate.
But there are other lines ofapproach, as we have seen during the past two or three years.
Rubashovbelongs to the older generation of Bolsheviks that was largely wiped outin the purges. During the Spanish Civil War he astutely avoids taking sides, and makes atrip to Italy.
Part of the time he feels that thingsmight have turned out differently. He himselffreely admits to this, and claims to have been cured of it.
For several years the rebellious slaves are uniformly successful. For ordinarypurposes he is impotent, it appears, till the age of thirty or so.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]