|
From: | Dalibor Topic |
Subject: | Re: Reverting changes |
Date: | Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:13:54 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 |
Michael Koch wrote:
Am Freitag, 2. April 2004 19:01 schrieb Mark Wielaard:- * HACKING: Updated information about regenerating auto* files and - documented the existence of autogen.sh.I really wonder if autogen.sh is really needed. We can just use "autoreconf" too. I tried it and I found no reason yet to dont use it.When this is properly domentated it should be okay ofr our usage. Any opinions on this ?
I agree.But I must admit that I haven't looked at the patch that added autogen.sh, so there may be a good reason to have the script instead.
cheers, dalibor topic
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |