[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java
From: |
Archie Cobbs |
Subject: |
Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:21:29 -0500 (CDT) |
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Personally, I think that nothing should ever be "spurious", but
> > it looks like I already lost that argument :-)
>
> I've got a reference for that, too :)
>
> http://www.lambdacs.com/cpt/FAQ.html#Q94
>
> "Spurious wakeups may sound strange but on some multiprocessor systems,
> making condition wakeup completely predictable might substantially slow
> all condition variable operations. [Butenhof]"
Ah.. that's a very good point that I didn't think of.. OK I'm convinced :-)
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
- Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/16
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Archie Cobbs, 2004/06/16
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/17
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Archie Cobbs, 2004/06/17
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/18
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Archie Cobbs, 2004/06/18
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/18
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java,
Archie Cobbs <=
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/18
Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Steven Augart, 2004/06/18
Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Mark Wielaard, 2004/06/28