[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coreutils] added ability in sort to skip n number of lines for each
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: [coreutils] added ability in sort to skip n number of lines for each file |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:28:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
On 18/11/10 16:36, Jim Hester wrote:
> A common problem when sorting files stems from the file containing 1
> or more header lines, which should not be sorted. As of now, the
> common solution to this problem is to remove the header lines with
> manually, or to output only the non header lines with tail, awk, or
> some other program and pipe the results to sort.
Thanks for the patch!
> This was likely not
> deemed a problem when sort was only single threaded, as the printing
> and pipe was likely still faster than the sort itself. However with
> multi-threaded sort this results in the operation bottle necking
> waiting for more information from the pipe.
I'm not following the argument above.
One can always print the header synchronously?
I.E. the `head` below is guaranteed to run before the `sort`
printf "z_header\nb\na\n" > file
(head -n1 file; sort <(tail -n+2 file) <(tail -n+2 file))
Now the above is awkward and dependent on bash
(constructs per file), so your idea has some merit I think.
> This common operation
> would be greatly improved if sort could simply print a user defined
> number of lines for each file. I have made a simple patch to
> implement this feature, which I have attached to this email.
Note `join` recently got the --header option
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2010-01/msg00284.html
also essentially to exclude starting lines from order comparisons.
cheers,
Pádraig.
Re: [coreutils] added ability in sort to skip n number of lines for each file, Assaf Gordon, 2010/11/22