[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: readlink(1) of more than one file? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:34:25 +0100 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
>> The awkward/somewhat redundant -n, --no-newline option
>> is handled in the same way as on BSD and the help text adjusted like:
>>
>> - -n, --no-newline do not output the trailing newline\n\
>> + -n, --no-newline do not output the separator character\n\
>
> Good point.
> Now that the long-named --no-newline is a misnomer, we might want to
> provide a better long-named option (like --no-separator) and begin the
> deprecation process. E.g., warn that the --no-newline option is being
> deprecated, and add a FIXME to give an error in a few years.
As I reread this, I think changing/deprecating is not worth the
trouble after all.
- readlink(1) of more than one file?, Aaron Davies, 2012/12/12
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/12
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Eric Blake, 2012/12/12
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Jim Meyering, 2012/12/12
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/12
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Jim Meyering, 2012/12/12
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/13
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/14
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Jim Meyering, 2012/12/14
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/12/15
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/15
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Dmitry V. Levin, 2012/12/15
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/15
- Re: readlink(1) of more than one file?, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/17