[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sort with header/skip-lines support
From: |
Assaf Gordon |
Subject: |
Sort with header/skip-lines support |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:57:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4 |
Hello,
I'd like to re-visit an old issue: adding header-line/skip-lines support to
'sort'.
It has been discussed few times in the past, but IMHO the suggested workarounds
fall short:
1. Sometimes using 'bash' specific constructs [1]
2. No error checking (e.g. running head/tail/sed without checking for errors)
3. Using multiple input files is convoluted.
4. Suggestions work for regular files, but not for pipes [2].
The attached draft patch is based on Jim Hester's patch [3], rebased to the
latest sort, with some fixes and tests.
It seems to work fine, except one glaring omission: it only works when output
is STDOUT because creating the output file is a brute-force ugly hack.
The syntax is
sort --skip-lines=N [other options]
The two tests are:
make check TESTS=tests/misc/sort-skip-lines SUBDIRS=.
make check TESTS=tests/misc/sort-skip-lines-bigfiles SUBDIRS=.
RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes
If this is something you are willing to consider, I'm happy to hear comments
and suggestions and improve it.
Alternatively, perhaps this is a good candidate for a "contrib" script, but I'm
not sure how do go about developing a shell script that is posix compliant, has
robust error checking, and still be a full 'drop-in' replacement for sort (many
options combinations).
Thanks,
-gordon
[1] - bash work-around:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2010-11/msg00084.html
[2] - no pipe support:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-07/msg00215.html
[3] - Jim's patch:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2010-11/msg00091.html
0001-sort-add-skip-lines-N-feature.patch.xz
Description: application/xz
- Sort with header/skip-lines support,
Assaf Gordon <=