[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t, |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:43:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 10/09/2013 12:34 AM, Gabriel Gaster wrote:
> PS. I just read a conversation linked on Pádraig's site as a 'TODO'.
>
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15157
> GNU bug report logs - #15157 join doesn't follow norms and dies instead of
> doing something useful w/duplicate options
>
> While I'm not sure, it seems that this might be a related conversation --
> regarding command-line specified arguments overriding environment settings. I
> read pieces from that exchange but I couldn't determine if the todo is to
> allow the command-like specified field-separator to override settings in LC_*
> or not.
It is kind of related, well spotted.
Though that's specifically about how sort -t, -t: is handled.
I've responded separately in this thread as to why -t,
should probably not ingore ',' as a grouping character.
thanks,
Pádraig.
- question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Gabriel Gaster, 2013/10/08
- Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Eric Blake, 2013/10/08
- Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Pádraig Brady, 2013/10/08
- Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Eric Blake, 2013/10/08
- Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Gabriel Gaster, 2013/10/09
- Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Gabriel Gaster, 2013/10/09
- Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Eric Blake, 2013/10/09
- Re: question about behavior of sort -n -t,, Gabriel Gaster, 2013/10/09