[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] dircolors: consider COLORTERM sufficient for color
From: |
Arsen Arsenović |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] dircolors: consider COLORTERM sufficient for color |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Feb 2022 00:36:33 +0100 |
[ Reposting since I didn't reply-all the first time; apologies ]
> Your change could break this setup if there were
> entries in "specific config" that weren't overridden later,
> and even if they were, it would result in larger LS_COLORS env vars.
Ah, I see. I lacked a full understanding of this format so I overlooked
that, sorry.
> How about the attached patch to allow matching COLORTERM
> just like TERM, and set the pattern in the default config
> to match against any COLORTERM value.
> This also has the advantage of handling specific COLORTERM values.
This looks fine, and works on my machine.
> We would have to add the default COLORTERM entry to distro config
> (when supported by the installed dircolors), but that should be easy enough
> to do.
Don't distros just generally use the compiled-in default?
Thanks again,
--
Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature