[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD |
Date: |
Fri, 12 May 2006 13:26:16 -0400 (EDT) |
Mark D. Baushke writes:
>
> Either that, or that someone has sent garbage across the wire in the
> client/server protocol (i.e., see the changes to handle_mt()).
Hmmm, I hadn't thought about that. For those cases, it would probably
be better to issue a fatal error() rather than calling assert() since
it's the client that's screwed up, not the server.
-Larry Jones
Philistines. -- Calvin
- [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, (continued)
- [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/15
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/15
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/15
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/12
RE: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, address@hidden, 2006/05/11
Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, address@hidden, 2006/05/11