cwriter-fr
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Cwriter-fr] overpowering


From: Oswald Gay
Subject: [Cwriter-fr] overpowering
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:17:21 +0100

It is probably not a coincidence thatthe best writers of the thirties have been poets.
There is no need to under-rate him now because he wasover-rated a few years ago. Communists and near-Communists had adisproportionately large influence in the literary reviews. The first part of thebook, is, more or less, an evaluation of present-day literature.
There is no need to under-rate him now because he wasover-rated a few years ago.
Why should WRITERS beattracted by a form of socialism that makes mental honesty impossible?
Even the whales own movements wouldprobably be imperceptible to you. Nevertheless his interesting essay only glances veryshortly at this difficulty.
In other words, purpose has come back, the younger writers have goneinto politics.
Most people canget a job of sorts, even at the worst of times.
Here was aChurch, an army, an orthodoxy, a discipline.
For several years the old-young antagonismtook on a quality of real hatred. In cultured circlesart-for-arts-saking extended practically to a worship of themeaningless. Literature was supposed to consist solely in themanipulation of words. But it appears that to writesuccessfully about such a world you have got to believe in it.
What Joyce is saying is Here is life without God. And what areyou going to write about, dear? Throughout those years Russia means Tolstoy,Dostoievsky, and exiled counts driving taxi-cabs.
But all the same it was thedespised highbrows who had captured the young.
So he flees to Mexico, and then dies at forty-five, a few years beforethe wave of death gets going. Similar remarks are scattered throughout Mr MacNeices book.
Youhave not necessarily got rid of the need for SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN.
Even the handful one couldname have usually been bad Catholics. They can swallow totalitarianism BECAUSE they have noexperience of anything except liberalism.
The first part of thebook, is, more or less, an evaluation of present-day literature. After the bombs and thefood-queues and the recruiting-posters, a human voice! But it appears that to writesuccessfully about such a world you have got to believe in it. Various other writers have made similar or comparable statements.
However, there is more than one kind of irresponsibility.
In cultured circlesart-for-arts-saking extended practically to a worship of themeaningless.
It is almost inconceivable thatgood novels should be written in such an atmosphere.
The slump in religious belief, forinstance, was spectacular. That was not actually the truth about the war, but it was the truthabout the individual reaction. Most people canget a job of sorts, even at the worst of times. As Hitlersthree targets of attack were, to all appearances, Great Britain, France,and the U.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]