[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: build problem: ddd 3.3.7 link errors on HP-UX 10.20
From: |
SEIP,CHRISTOPHER (HP-Roseville,ex1) |
Subject: |
RE: build problem: ddd 3.3.7 link errors on HP-UX 10.20 |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:18:43 -0700 |
Chris Seip & Andrew Gaylard conversed:
CS> I am having trouble at the final link stage of
CS> compiling ddd 3.3.7 on HP-UX 10.20. (Using:
CS> gcc 3.3.1, binutils 2.14, GNU make 3.80, and
CS> the ld that's built into HP-UX).
CS> When building the ddd executable, the linker
CS> complains about unsatisfied symbols:
CS> typeinfo name for HintGraphNode(data)
CS> typeinfo name for _StatusMsg(data)
CS> typeinfo name for AgentManager(data)
CS> typeinfo name for ReadLineAgent(data)
CS> typeinfo name for StatusMsg(data)
CS> typeinfo name for AsyncAgent(data)
CS> typeinfo name for PosGraphNode(data)
CS> typeinfo name for StatusDelay(data)
CS> typeinfo name for Graph(data)
CS> typeinfo name for TTYAgent(data)
CS> typeinfo name for LiterateAgent(data)
CS> Collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
CS> Any advice you can provide would be
CS> appreciated! Thanks,
CS> --Chris--
AG> Hmmmm. Interesting wrinkle.
AG> I've tried the same build on my 735/125, and
AG> get the same results exactly. If I strip the
AG> binaries, I get "main" not found. If I build
AG> without -O2, I get zillions of undefined symbols.
AG> This looks like a problem with HP-UX's SOM
AG> linker. I'm using the December-2001 patch
AG> bundle, which is the last AFAIK for HPUX-10.20.
AG> I'm trying a build with with no debugging (-g
AG> removed) and -O2 on. If that fails, I'll try
AG> HP aCC.
AG> I'll let you know...
AG> Andrew.
AG> PS: I'd really like DDD to work on HPUX-10.20;
AG> it's my main platform for my day-job.
Hey Andrew,
Thanks for the reply! It's at least comforting to
have someone else re-create the problem.
I have been fiddling with different configuration
options, most recently trying to compile with the
X11R6 libraries and headers instead of X11R4. I
think you are more on track than I am...
--Chris--