[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite
From: |
Jim Nutt |
Subject: |
Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:53:27 -0800 |
Actually it can be done in one line.. Just make the first line of the file
something like this:
<!-- -*- mode: php; c-file-style: "bsd" -*- -->
That's a single line and does the job nicely.
jim
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:03:33 +0100
Roland Mas <address@hidden> wrote:
> Tim Perdue (2002-12-18 08:10:39 -0600) :
>
> > Roland Mas wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> // Local Variables:
> >> // mode: php
> >> // c-file-style: "bsd"
> >> // End:
> >
> > Four lines in every file just for emacs?
>
> Well, yes. Four small lines. And why not, after all? It makes life
> easier for those of us not using a sub-editor ;-), and ensures
> compliance with your guidelines. I personnally dislike indenting with
> tabs (gratuitous waste of screen space). I'm willing to comply, but
> don't make that an extra effort for me (and others). Oh and don't
> worry, I'll add those lines to the files when I first open them, so
> you don't have to add them yourself.
>
> >>>-Easily spawn tasks from tracker items
> >>> (if a bug is submitted, you should be able to easily spin that
> >>>into task manager, same for patches)
> >> That's not exactly the way I thought of it. Bugs/patches/tracker
> >> items and tasks are independent of each other, in my mind. Again,
> >> please make that behaviour disablable.
> >
> > I think it's just a button or checkbox in the tracker, like "add a
> > task for this bug". So it's optional.
>
> Cool.
>
> >>>-when a constraining task is delayed, you must recursively
> >>> push back other tasks where necessary
> >> Um. Depends what you use for the end dates. If they record
> >> deadlines set by management, for instance, you can't just push them
> >> back as easily.
> >
> > That's how visio and ms project seem to handle it.
>
> Well, that's no excuse, is it?
>
> > I guess they assume that mgmt are the ones doing the modifications,
> > so if they push back a date, you always see the dependent tasks
> > moved back on the gantt chart as well.
>
> Mh. I see your point, but I still feel mine is valid. Please make
> that behaviour optional too :-)
>
> Roland.
> --
> Roland Mas
>
> With the arrest of Dimitry Sklyarov it has become apparent that it is not
> safe for non US software engineers to visit the United States. - Alan Cox
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-sf-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-sf-devel
>
>
pgp1Ci1n5J0De.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Tim Perdue, 2002/12/10
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Tim Uckun, 2002/12/10
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Roland Mas, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Tim Perdue, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Roland Mas, 2002/12/18
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite,
Jim Nutt <=
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Roland Mas, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Jim Nutt, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Tim Perdue, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Jim Nutt, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Roland Mas, 2002/12/19
- Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite, Tim Perdue, 2002/12/19