debian-sf-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite


From: Jim Nutt
Subject: Re: [Debian-sf-devel] Task Manager Rewrite
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:53:27 -0800

Actually it can be done in one line.. Just make the first line of the file 
something like this:

<!-- -*- mode: php; c-file-style: "bsd" -*- -->

That's a single line and does the job nicely.

jim


On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:03:33 +0100
Roland Mas <address@hidden> wrote:

> Tim Perdue (2002-12-18 08:10:39 -0600) :
> 
> > Roland Mas wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> // Local Variables:
> >> // mode: php
> >> // c-file-style: "bsd"
> >> // End:
> >
> > Four lines in every file just for emacs?
> 
> Well, yes.  Four small lines.  And why not, after all?  It makes life
> easier for those of us not using a sub-editor ;-), and ensures
> compliance with your guidelines.  I personnally dislike indenting with
> tabs (gratuitous waste of screen space).  I'm willing to comply, but
> don't make that an extra effort for me (and others).  Oh and don't
> worry, I'll add those lines to the files when I first open them, so
> you don't have to add them yourself.
> 
> >>>-Easily spawn tasks from tracker items
> >>>   (if a bug is submitted, you should be able to easily spin that
> >>>into task manager, same for patches)
> >>   That's not exactly the way I thought of it.  Bugs/patches/tracker
> >> items and tasks are independent of each other, in my mind.  Again,
> >> please make that behaviour disablable.
> >
> > I think it's just a button or checkbox in the tracker, like "add a
> > task for this bug". So it's optional.
> 
>   Cool.
> 
> >>>-when a constraining task is delayed, you must recursively
> >>>   push back other tasks where necessary
> >>   Um.  Depends what you use for the end dates.  If they record
> >> deadlines set by management, for instance, you can't just push them
> >> back as easily.
> >
> > That's how visio and ms project seem to handle it.
> 
>   Well, that's no excuse, is it?
> 
> > I guess they assume that mgmt are the ones doing the modifications,
> > so if they push back a date, you always see the dependent tasks
> > moved back on the gantt chart as well.
> 
>   Mh.  I see your point, but I still feel mine is valid.  Please make
> that behaviour optional too :-)
> 
> Roland.
> -- 
> Roland Mas
> 
> With the arrest of Dimitry Sklyarov it has become apparent that it is not
> safe for non US software engineers to visit the United States. - Alan Cox
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-sf-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-sf-devel
> 
> 

Attachment: pgp1Ci1n5J0De.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]