[DejaGnu] Differences between dejagnu-1.4.1 and dejagnu from sources.redhat .com

[Billinghurst, David (CRTS)]

I am planning to package dejagnu-1.4.1 for cygwin.  I have been using a
version built from source to test gcc-3.0 for a few months.  

The current cygwin port is based on the code on sources.redhat.com around
2001-01-17.  Any idea if this is close to dejagnu-1.4

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [SMTP:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 July 2001 11:08
> To:   address@hidden
> Subject:      Re: dejagnu-1.4.1 packaging in progress
> 
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:40:01AM -0000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
> wrote:
> >My objective is to be able to test gcc-3 on cygwin with the official
> >cygwin dejagnu.  I will (try and) do whatever is needed to acheive this
> >result.
> >
> >Some questions:
> >
> >Is there an easy way to identify the "local cygwin hacks"?
> 
> Hmm.  I don't believe that there is.  There may be an import branch for
> dejagnu in CVS but I don't know for sure.
> 
> >For example, do you know of a dejagnu version that is a common
> predecessor
> >of both gnu dejagnu-1.4.1 and the dejagnu from sources.redhat.com? (or do
> I
> >just diff source trees?)
> 
> Again, I don't know.  Is there a dejagnu version number that could provide
> a clue?
> 
> For all I know the cygwin stuff is already in dejagnu 1.4.1.
> 
> >Is there some performance spec for cygwin dejagnu to meet? 
> >For example, a cygwin dejagnu must run the xxx and yyy testsuites?
> 
> Just being able to run gcc, binutils, gdb, should be adequate.
> 
> cgf