demexp-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Demexp-dev] Issues on classification


From: David MENTRE
Subject: Re: [Demexp-dev] Issues on classification
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 18:54:59 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)

Hello Félix,

address@hidden writes:

> After thinking, one main problem is that a question can belong to
> several categories, which makes the parsing more difficult.

I think we must decouple the keywords attached to a Question from the
different hierarchies of keywords used to reach this Question.

The keywords would be used to attach some semantics to a Question.

A hierarchy of keywords would be used to navigate into the forest of
keywords, grouping them by common topics, i.e. related subjects.

At least it was the main idea behind my first design using bit
vectors. However, several issues are raised when the classification
hierarchy evolves. We will have to discuss this in front of a white
board.

> Alternative possibilities:
> -The user chooses the category (possibly creating a new one). We know that 
> this
> will no longer be feasible in a large scale system, however, smaller groups
> wanting to use the DemExp independently may like this feature.
> -The hierachy of categories is pre-set and/or evolved by a "person in charge"
> and the user can only put his/her question in an existing category
>
> Would this make the implementation easier?

I have not reached yet this level of design, i.e. interaction with the
user to create new categories and extend the hierarchy. I'll tell you
then what seems to me the easiest. A priori, I think the first choice is
simpler. 

> I like the U2 name. I guess the ultimate version can be named T4 (Too much
> Trouble To Think about).

:)

Thank you for your feedback.
Yours,
d.
-- 
 David Mentré <address@hidden>
   http://www.linux-france.org/~dmentre/david-mentre-public-key.asc
 GnuPG key fingerprint: A7CD 7357 3EC4 1163 745B  7FD3 FB3E AD7C 2A18 BE9E




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]