[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Demexp-dev] Re: Use of CDuce
From: |
David MENTRE |
Subject: |
[Demexp-dev] Re: Use of CDuce |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:00:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
While I'm at asking question, I have a batch of others:
My main issue is to avoid converting the whole XML file into an OCaml
representation and then convert this representation into the demexp data
structures. Does CDuce help in this?
BTW, I also noticed that CDuce relies on PXP. There is no license issue
with PXP (it is already in debian, package libpxp-ocaml-dev) so we could
fall back on PXP to read/write XML, maybe at the cost of usability
compared to CDuce.
I'm still pondering the advantages and inconvenients of all this XML
machinery. I still fear to much complexity for rather simple needs
(convert XML to demexp ocaml structures and vice versa).
Yours,
d.
--
pub 1024D/A3AD7A2A 2004-10-03 David MENTRE <address@hidden>
5996 CC46 4612 9CA4 3562 D7AC 6C67 9E96 A3AD 7A2A
- [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., Serge Leblanc, 2004/10/10
- Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., David MENTRE, 2004/10/10
- Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., Serge Leblanc, 2004/10/10
- Message not available
- Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., David MENTRE, 2004/10/10
- Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., Serge Leblanc, 2004/10/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., David MENTRE, 2004/10/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., skaller, 2004/10/11
- Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile., Serge Leblanc, 2004/10/12
- Use of CDuce (was: Re: [Demexp-dev] CDuce binding in Makefile.), David MENTRE, 2004/10/13
- [Demexp-dev] Re: Use of CDuce,
David MENTRE <=
- [Demexp-dev] Re: Use of CDuce, Serge Leblanc, 2004/10/14
- [Demexp-dev] Re: Use of CDuce, David MENTRE, 2004/10/15