Re: [Demexp-dev] Question about tags, tags updating and timestamp.

[David MENTRE]

Hello Ketty,

"ketty ." <address@hidden> writes:

> You are right, it can't be completely stateless. The question is rather:
> either we store timestamps for all objects in the demexp server, or we store
> the full representation of all objects in the demexp-web server.

And storing timestamps is clearly more efficient from a memory and CPU
point of view.

However, the sub-element timestamps would not be available by RPC method
get_timestamps() so as to avoid getting to many data on the network. One
would need to get a question details to get the sub-element timestamps.

Would you agree?

Best wishes,
d.
-- 
GPG/PGP key: A3AD7A2A David MENTRE <address@hidden>
 5996 CC46 4612 9CA4 3562  D7AC 6C67 9E96 A3AD 7A2A