[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type
From: |
Martin Grabmueller |
Subject: |
Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:45:13 +0200 |
> From: stefan <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:14:37 +0200 (CEST)
>
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Martin Grabmueller wrote:
>
> > - `binary-concat' should be `binary-concat!' because it has a side
> > effect on the binary argument.
>
> So all things having effect on the argument are suffixed by "!" ?
Yes. For example, `reverse' creates a complete newly allocated list,
whereas `reverse!' will modify the structure of an existing list to
produce the reversed list. Also see `string-set!' or `vector-set!'.
> > - What about making the last argument to `binary-subset' an optional
> > argument? That would mean:
>
> Good idea, too. Also I would like it more (binary-subset start length)
> which would be more like the (substring) thingy.
Hum? substring _is_ `substring str start end', not `substring str
start length'. Or have I misunderstood you?
> Your help is welcome. Please do so.
OK.
'martin
- [dev-serveez] binary data type, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/20
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, stefan, 2001/07/20
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type,
Martin Grabmueller <=
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, stefan, 2001/07/24
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, stefan, 2001/07/27
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/28
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, stefan, 2001/07/28
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/30