|
From: | Tim Dobson |
Subject: | [Dfey-nw-discuss] 'Safetynet and esafety' |
Date: | Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:30:33 +0000 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) |
The lists seem very inactive, mostly being used for annoucements, not discussion, but one, "safetynet"[2] focuses on 'children's e-safety.
The list obviously isn't a place for debates on whether content filtering is a good idea, this is taken for granted but doing it most.
Recently I saw this email come through and I wondered what you thought...(To be honest I'm instantly wary of anything with the word 'youngster' in it because it seems to me to be a word used by people who are really out of touch with young people)
Tim Ruth Hammond wrote:
http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/News/Youngsters-want-more-internet-protection-says-new-reportChildren living away from home, or using social care services, want to feel safer online, be protected from unsuitable sites and have adult supervision, highlights a new report. The report, ‘Future care: Children’s advice on future care standards’, follows consultation with 686 children and young people - aged between four and 20 - who attended the 2008 national children’s conference. These youngsters discussed the key issues that they would like to see considered for future inclusion in the National Minimum Standards. Recommendation 8 Children should be kept safe on the internet by blocking unsuitable sites and chatrooms, adult supervision of internet use, location of computers where their use can be supervised, and by teaching internet safety to young children.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Becta [2] http://lists.becta.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/safetynet -- www.tdobson.net ---- If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us still has one object. If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now has two ideas. - George Bernard Shaw
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |