[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website
From: |
Connor Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:37:28 +0100 |
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 14:07 +0100, Rob Barry wrote:
> I personally think it is a bit of a waste of money.... The only real
> thing it's being used for atm is irssi over SSH. We could've got what
> we needed for about £20 per year in all honesty.... I don't think we
> ever really needed this much flexibility.
>
> As long as we have people willing to front the money though, i see no
> need to switch.
As people are willing to pay, and the pros outweigh the cons (which is
why the people who are paying for it are), I see no issue with our
having a VPS. The only argument I have seen put forward is it being
"overkill", which isn't a drawback in and of itself.
Clearly it is useful to certain members of the community, and as they
are those who are paying for it, Dogfish could perhaps be viewed as a
gift which they are providing to the rest of us free of charge - and, in
that light, I'm sure all of us who use it are grateful. And anyone who
doesn't use it doesn't need to care either way...
Thanks,
cls
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, (continued)
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Rob Barry, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Richard Thompson, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Tim Dobson, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Rob Barry, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Stephen Mount, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Robert Leverington, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Richard Thompson, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Connor Smith, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Tim Dobson, 2009/07/24
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website, Isabell Long, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website,
Connor Smith <=