discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Tx and Rx on USRP simultaneously, device already


From: Marcus D. Leech
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Tx and Rx on USRP simultaneously, device already claimed
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:48:49 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0

On 10/07/2019 05:25 PM, Mark Wagner wrote:
Yeah, here's a basic example of the flowgraph 

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:17 AM Marcus D Leech <address@hidden> wrote:
 Could you share a minimal flow graph that displays the issue?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Mark Wagner <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm trying to transmit from the TX/RX port of a USRP while receiving from RX2 but I'm getting a 'device already claimed' error message. Here are some details:
>
> My USRP sink block uses multiple USRP addresses, i.e.
>
> "addr0=192.168.1.2,addr1=192.168.2.2,addr3=192.168.3.2,..."
>
> and each address goes to a different USRP in an array. I want to transmit a calibration tone across the array from the TX channel of the first USRP (addr0), but when I add a USRP source block it gives a 'device already claimed' message. This doesn't happen when I make individual USRP sink blocks for each USRP in the array.
>
> Unfortunately if I separate my devices into several USRP sink blocks I can't guarantee the devices will be synched to the PPS. Is there a workaround for this?
>
> -Mark
>
> --
> Mark Wagner
> University of California San Diego
> Electrical and Computer Engineering

> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


--
Mark Wagner
University of California San Diego
Electrical and Computer Engineering
 
Could you give more details of your hardware configuration.  Are these N210s?  X310s?


Also, I'll note that 32K as a sample rate is well below what is normally supported--do the start-up messages complain about that?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]