[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject Line Prefix Missing
From: |
Johannes Demel |
Subject: |
Re: Subject Line Prefix Missing |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:21:12 +0000 |
Hi all,
I was wondering about that mailing list behavior as well.
My solution
1. If "Mail From 'address@hidden'"
2. If "Mail To 'address@hidden'"
In my case: move to folder.
1. covers original mails
2. covers replies.
I had to split this into 2 separate rules but that's due to my email
service provider.
This solution is more verbose about who receives such an email. e.g.
off-list replies should not end up to be caught by these rules.
Anyways, I just wanted to share my 2 cents on that. Maybe someone finds
this info useful.
Cheers
Johannes
On 30.10.19 15:11, Müller, Marcus (CEL) wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> "deliberate" would be wrong. Surprising, not really, if we'd have read
> the info mails from the gnu.org mailing list admin more carefully:
>
> In the process of respecting DMARC in the ML infrastructure, they
> disabled rewriting of the subject line for outgoing mail servers that
> signal strict DMARC compliance. The mailing list seems to think your
> server does (I don't know why, to be honest, can't seem to find those
> DNS entries).
>
> So, for now, my understanding is that there's nothing *we* can do about
> it. (We should be able to change the settings of the ML; but in which
> range, and what we'd break on the way, isn't quite clear to us at this
> point.)
>
> For some reason, my university mail server seems to sort these mails
> correctly, and so do GMail instances. Probably a list header?
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>
> On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 09:17 -0400, Ed Criscuolo wrote:
>> I've noticed that recent postings to the list are missing
>> the "[Discuss-gnuradio] prefix that was automatically
>> added to the subject line.
>>
>> Was this a deliberate change? I hope not, as I find that
>> feature very useful in picking out the list messages
>> from amid all the spam.
>>
>>
>> @(^.^)@ Ed
>>