[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: StepBox v1.2
|
From: |
MJ Ray |
|
Subject: |
Re: StepBox v1.2 |
|
Date: |
29 Oct 2003 02:18:00 GMT |
copal <copal@dragonhelix.org> wrote:
> the scheme is simple if you take time to weed through the code:
Why is it not in the docs? Anyway, your model seems quite different to where
we have ended up. Basically, we do not have 2, 2, 4, 5 and 6 and I don't
think we will. Minimalism.
Re: StepBox v1.2, Yen-Ju Chen, 2003/10/27
Re: StepBox v1.2, Yen-Ju Chen, 2003/10/29