[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep & FOSDEM 2004
From: |
Helge Hess |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep & FOSDEM 2004 |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:38:02 +0100 |
On 07.01.2004, at 12:16, Fred Kiefer wrote:
No reason to get upset.
No one is upset, but FOSDEM is coming near and so far there was little
feedback on my suggestion ;-)
As usual there are a lot of different oppinions in this mailing list.
And I, for example, like your idea of a shared panel very much. I
think this years GNUstep presentation should be focused on user
applications, as during the last year we made the greates progress in
this area.
Sounds very good to me.
And OGo is surely the most wellknown application in the bigger GNUstep
environment.
What about presentations on some of the interesting application, that
where writen/completed in the last year? Of course we should also give
short talks on Gorm and Renaissance, to catch the atention of new
GNUstep users. Or just use these, when showing how to extend the given
applications?
I think a mini-from-scratch-tutorial on that would be quite nice. After
all this is considered to be a major GNUstep advantage - rapid building
of powerful applications.
Who would be willing to do presentations at all? I intend to be at
this FOSDEM, but don't have anything to show, being to lazy to develop
something in the last year now shows.
Well, I'm pretty bad at making presentations, last years was awful ;-)
But I could try again to give two overviews on OGo, one from a
developers point of view (what is in there for reuse) and one from a
users point of view.
Anyway, so far someone would need to organize a developers room with
the FOSDEM team - I guess we are already late again ... The one two
years ago was pretty good, I didn't like the big one last year too
much.
Greets,
Helge
--
I'm describing in a paragraph what took 14 hours to figure out. You may
want to sniff glue for a while, then reread this when you get out of
rehab. [aLa]
Re: GNUstep & FOSDEM 2004, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2004/01/05
Message not available