[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML idea
From: |
Kazunobu Kuriyama |
Subject: |
Re: XML idea |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:38:06 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 |
Fred Kiefer wrote:
What I would like to see here is a bit of configuration for the
GNUstep libraries. If there is an OpenStep purist, he/she should be
able to compile GNUstep base and gui with as mininal extensions to the
OpenStep specification as possible (Here I mean a bit more than the
current usage of STRICT_OPENSTEP). And a Cocoa aficionado could set
another switch to get as much support as possible. The rest of us
"moderates" would of course get the best of two worlds. But here I
realize, I must be dreaming.
In addition to that, for application programmers, could someone define a
set of conveninent macros like _OPENSTEP_SOURCE, _GNUSTEP_EXTENSIONS,
_X102_SOURCE, _X103_SOURCE and so on in, say, GSConfig.h?
Usage of these macros is just like _POSIX_SOURCE, _BSD_SOURCE, _SVID_SOURCE,
and _GNU_SOURCE which are found in features.h of glibc. Or, -make can be used
just like imake does. How about it?
- Kazunobu Kuriyama
- Re: XML idea, (continued)
- RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/07
- RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/08
- Re: XML idea, Kazunobu Kuriyama, 2004/01/08
- RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/09
- Re: XML idea,
Kazunobu Kuriyama <=
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/10