Re: Frameworks integration

[Helge Hess]

On 28.02.2004, at 06:21, S.J.Chun wrote:
> At least, GNUstepWeb and SOPE has each merits: GNUstepWeb is much more 
> compatible with WebObjects in terms of EOF, and SOPE is known for its 
> more mature state. :-)

No, not really.

First:  EOF is a completely separate issue, of course you could also 
use GDL2 with SOPE and this isn't part of gnustep-web.

Second: I think NGObjWeb is more compatible with WebObjects than 
gnustep-web (eg concerning template parsing, though we have stripped 
out some stuff for OGo [but could put back things like "WEBOBJECT" 
instead of "#" or .woo files in case someone actually cares <I guess 
not>]).

> I'm using and testing both of them, and it's very interesting...

Well, if you find anything where SOPE is not compatible with WO (again: 
let alone EOF, completely different framework), let me know. We could 
make a list on that and explain ;-)

PS: Absolutely no offense intended wrt gnustep-web. Its just that 
NGObjWeb should provide everything it does yet is several years more 
mature and also provides much in addition. So it might make sense to 
focus efforts on this area, but if there is no interest, I'm fine as 
well ;-) Of course its really annoying to have duplicate development.

regards,
  Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge
OpenGroupware.org