[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep and GTK+
From: |
Michael Baehr |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep and GTK+ |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 12:51:15 -0500 |
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 12:28:20 -0500, Robert Burns <altivec87@cox.net> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Gee, that was a quick response. LOL
>
> I think it could be interesting. If I stated the reasons for which I
> thought it would be useful, I'd be flamed into oblivion. Besides, we've
> covered it before onto IRC. I think we should just agree to disagree on
> this point.
>
> I'll try to put this mildly. I personally like GTK; I like the look &
> feel. A lot of other people do as well. I think that if a great - but
> small - toolkit were built for it, (and let's face it, raw GTK/C
> suxx0rz) that it would be used in many, many applications. It would be
> great exposure for GNUstep. And, the project wouldn't be particularly
> difficult. It definitely wouldn't be reinventing AppKit. GTK already
> exists; it just needs a new front-end. I can't see it taking more than a
> few months to have a solid release out there.
>
> Robert Burns
>
I think GTK+ is a fine toolkit, as well. However, it has a perfectly
fine object model already and I haven't seen the lack of an OPENSTEP
frontend to it resulting in a dearth of any GTK+ apps. If, however,
you want to pursue integration, I think the best idea may be simply to
abstract the backend away to _render_ in different toolkits; i.e. an
app could use self-drawing GNUstep widgets or have everything be
drawn by GTK. That, of course, opens up a whole 'nother can of worms.
--
Michael Baehr - Arch Linux GNUstep Geek
- GNUstep and GTK+, Adam Fedor, 2004/08/06
- Re: GNUstep and GTK+, Quentin Mathé, 2004/08/06
- Re: GNUstep and GTK+, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2004/08/06
- Re: GNUstep and GTK+, Helge Hess, 2004/08/08
- Re: GNUstep and GTK+, Andrew Pinski, 2004/08/08
Re: GNUstep and GTK+, Martin Häcker, 2004/08/08