[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:56:03 +0100 (BST) |
> >> You're right, but he suggested modifying ld.so.conf, to include
> >> library
> >> paths for EVERY user. Using /etc/profile to set up LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
> >> fine, and the Right Way IMHO.
> >
> > You're of course aware that setuid executables ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > for
> > security reasons so unless you add GNUstep library paths to ld.so.conf,
> > you will never be able to execute a setuid executable compiled using
> > GNUstep.
>
> I think we were talking about different things. ~/Library/Libraries
> should never be in ld.so.conf, it seemed like you were advocating that.
> If not, then we do not disagree.
Apologies then. I definitely agree with you that ~/Library/Libraries
should never be in ld.so.conf. Thanks for pointing out if I said
something which might have been interpreted as meaning that.
Thanks
- Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, (continued)
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, John Davidorff Pell, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, John Davidorff Pell, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, John Davidorff Pell, 2004/08/19