[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent)
From: |
Banlu Kemiyatorn |
Subject: |
Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent) |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:42:59 +0700 |
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:28:09 +0100, MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> On 2004-08-30 15:54:58 +0100 Banlu Kemiyatorn <object@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Here's our private conversation and let''s see who is
> > the problem child here. This is my last message.
>
> Anyone reading those should know that they are edited and some of the
> worst mail has been left out. It doesn't even include all I quoted
> earlier.
>
Would you please forward the worst missing mail to me privately?
Because I don't remember if I actually edit any thing rather
traditional cut & pasting job.
]d
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent), MJ Ray, 2004/08/30
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent), Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2004/08/30
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent), MJ Ray, 2004/08/30
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent), Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2004/08/30
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent),
Banlu Kemiyatorn <=
- List etiquette, Alex Perez, 2004/08/30
- Re: List etiquette, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2004/08/30
- Message not available
- Re: List etiquette, MJ Ray, 2004/08/30
- Re: List etiquette, Michael Baehr, 2004/08/30
- Re: List etiquette, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2004/08/30
Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent), Björn Giesler, 2004/08/30