[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review [Was: GNA is down...}
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Code review [Was: GNA is down...} |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:55:42 +0000 |
On 14 Feb 2012, at 14:51, Quentin Mathé wrote:
> I'm not sure what gave you this impression about the code review support in
> GitHub. The Pull Requests section for code review looks easy to use but more
> limited than ReviewBoard though.
> ReviewBoard was more powerful (e.g. precise comparisons between patch
> revisions, review per patch revision, side-by-side diff, threaded comments)
> but had some UI pitfalls too.
For clarification:
I was comparing GitHub to the ViewVC and Fossil ability to show diffs, not to
ReviewBoard (which, I believe, supports multiple VCS).
David
- Re: GNA is down..., (continued)
- Re: GNA is down..., Eric Wasylishen, 2012/02/13
- Code review [Was: GNA is down...}, Fred Kiefer, 2012/02/13
- Re: Code review [Was: GNA is down...}, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2012/02/14
- Re: Code review [Was: GNA is down...}, David Chisnall, 2012/02/14
- Re: Code review [Was: GNA is down...}, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2012/02/14
- Re: Code review [Was: GNA is down...}, Quentin Mathé, 2012/02/14
- Re: Code review [Was: GNA is down...},
David Chisnall <=
- Re: GNA is down..., Pirmin Braun, 2012/02/13
- Re: GNA is down..., Gregory Casamento, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Gregory Casamento, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Matt Rice, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Fred Kiefer, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Quentin Mathé, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Derek Fawcus, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Derek Fawcus, 2012/02/14
- Re: GNA is down..., Aria Stewart, 2012/02/16