[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #377 - 2 msgs
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #377 - 2 msgs |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Mar 2002 21:05:44 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Adam Theo wrote:
> actually, it is an RFC now. As of a few weeks ago, Peter Saint-Andre
> worked long and hard to submit an informational RFC to the IETF
> including the Jabber protocol as of the 1.4 server line.
Wohoo !. I should really subscribe jdev ;)
> And licensing permits, since the protocol is open and free like SMTP or
> HTTP, and the most popular server has just been GPL'ed.
GPL Rul3z .... So I have no doubts .. I just noticed that Jabber.org
has a philosophy section. Since I could not see any COPYING file in my CVS
of jabberd from jabberstudio , I may have got the wrong server. Where's
the real server ?.
Also I noticed Jabber had a php class library -- so it will make
integration with phpgw easier in the long term. This just could be the
glue we sorely need to bind Pnet, phpgw , Auth and (SEE | VRS).
> Cool. Yes, IQ is one of the really nifty things about Jabber's
> middleware potential. It's so easily expanded by anyone simply by adding
> a namespace...
I'm yet to try anything on Jabber, but from the proposals I read,
I think this should be a good idea to use a system that has proven
itself. Also XML rules any project from now on.
Gopal.V
PS: As I had said a long time ago, gziping XML to save on bandwidth
is a good idea. Hoping that jabber can manage that automagically.
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//