[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Backend Database Support
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Backend Database Support |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:05:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 16 April 2003 06:27 am, Chris Smith wrote:
> I'm thinking of supporting Berkeley DB by default as that supports
> everything the DGEE will need , including transactions (that can be
> integrated into goldwater to support transactions across multiple
> machines and databases!) and as it's embedded it removes the
> requirement of having to keep a database running in the background
> (yet another 'server' to manage!).
What is the difference between this and one of the DBMs, such as
Berkeley DBM and GNU DBM?
And somehow I doubt that transaction support is that simple :-\
> I want to check the licencing issues. I don't propose that BDB ever
> shipped with DGEE, it just needs to be installed on the target
> machine, and you could always build against another DB vendor if you
> want...
The license is GPL compatible, according to the GNU license list.
- --
Stephen Compall - Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
Jabber ID: address@hidden
I hate to break it to you, but there is no God.
-- RMS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+ndPN2AceYinZ4EgRAgZ6AJ9+t50gNgenYksO2N7JuKjPMMScMQCgkP9E
C5JF8f6Slf1qNjcLx/x6vg4=
=AZaV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----