[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Re: the .NET API patent issue
From: |
Norbert Bollow |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Re: the .NET API patent issue |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:52:17 +0200 (CEST) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marcus <address@hidden> wrote:
> Could you please explain which APIs are "patent-endangered APIs"?
> This phrase keeps being repeated, but I don't see if defined
> anywhere.
Ok... the cause for concern is the patent applciation called
"Application program interface for network software platform"
The abstract is:
An application program interface (API) provides a set of functions for
application developers who build Web applications on Microsoft
Corporation's .NET.TM. platform.
In the patent application, MS claims that "the inventors developed a
unique set of API functions for Microsoft's .NET.TM. platform."
I do now know whether the USPTO will agree that developing "a
unique set of API functions for Microsoft's .NET.TM. platform" is a
patentable invention, but rumor has it that the USPTO considers
just about anything to be patentable.
The full text is here:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='20030028685'
At first sight it looks like this could completely prevent the use
of both DotGNU and Mono in the US.
However, there are some mitigating factors:
1) MS has promised royalty-free licensing for everything in the
ECMA standards
2) Some API classes are not endangered because there is nothing
in them that could possibly qualify as a recent "invention". This
category includes in particular System.Windows.Forms
So, some API classes are _not_ endangered by the patent application
because of mitigating factors like 1) and 2).
With US-patent-endagered APIs I mean:
everything in that "unique set of API functions for Microsoft's
.NET.TM. platform" which MS claims to have "invented" for which
there is not a good reason like 1) and 2) why any patents on it
will not be enforcable.
Greetings, Norbert.
- --
Founder & Steering Committee member of http://gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/
Free Software Business Strategy Guide ---> http://FreeStrategy.info
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/hvHGoYIVvXUl7DIRAl3MAJwL66SWnyHUk//T/xbuvkd9EWJQSQCgwcaB
ambh9tlPia3YDdO7kbba8mk=
=333E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [DotGNU] the .NET API patent issue, (continued)
RE: [DotGNU]Re: the .NET API patent issue, Neil Cawse, 2003/10/10