Re: [Pnet-developers] libjit licensing

[Deryk Robosson]

I also have no problems with a change to LGPL v2.  Not that I have
much say in the matter but being as I haven't been around a whole lot
I thought I'd stick in my $.10 anyway. :)

Deryk


On Jan 4, 2008 6:08 PM, Klaus Treichel <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> changing the license of libjit to LGPL v2 or later is ok for me too.
>
> Cheers,
> Klaus
>
> Am Freitag, den 04.01.2008, 00:47 +0600 schrieb Aleksey Demakov:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here we go again. Just before the libjit-0.1.0 release we discussed
> > relaxing the libjit license. However his step has not been taken due
> > to some disagreements.
> >
> > I would like to bring up this issue again for the libjit-0.1.2 release.
> > The reasons for relicensing libjit are as follows:
> >
> > * other libraries with a similar scope use weaker licenses
> >   (GNU lightning - LGPL, LLVM - something BSD-like)
> >
> > * the current libjit license was already cited as one of the reasons
> >   the project using it was abandoned  (http://tromey.com/blog/?p=16)
> >   and  people keep voicing concerns about it as recently was the case
> >   with the ruby-libjit.
> >
> > So I would like to relicense libjit under LGPL v2 for the 0.1.2 release
> > As far as I remember the last time we discussed it all the major
> > contributors has already agreed on LGPL v2. Are there any abjections
> > to this now?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Aleksey
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pnet-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pnet-developers
>
>