[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Visionaries] Linux will Prevail with this method as it is free
From: |
Thinker Tank |
Subject: |
[Visionaries] Linux will Prevail with this method as it is free |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:45:20 -0800 (PST) |
I am a windows C# Programmer, whats the use if dotGNU programs wont
compile on Visual Studio .Net. It should be write one compile anywhere.
I would love to give my clients programs that run on Linux, But ...
I scare away my clients from Linux, just because I cant write programs
in Linux.
Now, If U give me dotGNU assemblies completely written in VS.Net that
do not require anything else installed on my Clients machines and can be
packaged in .Net only setup for windows then I promise that I would
never again ever use anything other than dotGNU. Because that will enable me to
tell my clients to use Linux and use the same tried and tested programs, which
I will compile in Linux for them.
Now, if that is done; U should let me compile the same code in Linux in
native format such that the programs wont require any virtual machine
while running on Linux. This seems like step back from Java but with
that I can tell my Clients that our programs run faster on Linux.
U should do the above because that will give Developers an economic
option to let their clients use Linux while they slowly and completely
move towards Linux. And no matter how much Microsoft modifies C# U wont
have to worry because all the windows programmers will be using will be
dotGNU wrappers that just wrap around .NET and match exactly to those on linux
which can be just updated to use latest C# features.
For Example; Microsoft creates a major C# upgrade that is very
important and promotes as a must upgrade for Developers. Then all dotGNU has to
do is release dotGNU2.0 which uses these features on Windows platform and at
the same time mimics those changes in dotGNU for Linux if they are so important.
I want to write programs for Linux but I don’t want to leave comfort
of my IDE that I am used to. So there goes the biggest problem in
adapting Linux. So what can U do about it? Logically its easy. If U create a
compiler to compile the IL file generated by VS.Net into native executables
that can run on Linux with out a Virtual Machine then rest will be history.
I am a professional software developer who is not interested in
stepping on many boats at the same time. We should be able to write programs
for Linux in VS.Net such that they will run on our clients windows machine
without any additional components other that create in VS.Net such as
dotGNU.Dll. dotGNU.Dll can be just a wrapper on MS.Net such that the code will
directly compile on Linux without any modifications.
That makes too much sense to me from my windows worlds if that happens
all Microsoft can do is sit back and watch the show as all client of
all MS Developers rush to Linux.
The point is u do whatever u want in Linux but just create parallelly
the same classes around MS.Net.
_____________________________________________________________
Linux.Net -->Open Source to everyone
Powered by Linare Corporation
http://www.linare.com/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Visionaries] Linux will Prevail with this method as it is free,
Thinker Tank <=