Re: [Dragora-members] [Website]: Dragora overview

[Matias Fonzo]

El 2020-09-17 06:03, Michael Siegel escribió:
> Am 16.09.20 um 22:52 schrieb Matias Fonzo:
>
> > I still don't know what Michael's idea is if he's going to create a
> > separate section for this, and where or in which part of the page, but 
> > I
> > think the information for Dragora might be something like this:
>
> Generally, my idea is that all (or most of) Dragora's official
> documentation should be part of the Dragora Handbook. Some of that
> content would then be copied (verbatim or shortened) or linked to from
> "the website". I put that in quotes because the Hanbook would also be 
> on
> the website, of course.

+1.

> But "the website" would provide a different way of accessing the
> information in the Handbook. For example, the content of the Report a
> Bug page would also be in the Contributing to Dragora section of the
> Handbook.

+1.

> I'm currently working on a structure for the Handbook, based on the 
> work
> I've done on the Devuan project a while back. The quick overview of the
> system is simply part of the About Dragora chapter there.

It sounds like you already have it in your head.  :-)

I wonder what that format will be.

> I would, however, also link to it from the Documentation page of the
> website, because it is pretty important.
>
> > Stable version: 3.0 (D3)
> > Release date: YYYY-MM-DD
> > Kernel: Linux-libre 5.4.x<-add latest version from release here>
> > Init system: Sysvinit
> > Service frameworkt: Perp
> > Package management: Graft
> >                     Qi
> >                     Qire
> > Package format: tlz
> > Desktop environments: Trinity Desktop (default).
> >                       DWM
> >                       ...
> > Supported architectures: <LIST ALL THE ARCHITECTURES FOR BOOTSTRAP>
> > Available images: <LIST AVAILABLE IMAGES>
> > Community:  Mailing list: <LINK>
> >             IRC: <INFO + LINK TO WEBCHAT>
> >             Other...
> >
> > It would be nice to add brief description of strong points, I think
> > strong points to develop a description are:
> >
> > * 100% Libre.
> > * Independent.
> >
> > Probably we should mention that Dragora also focus on security and
> > quality somehow.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Yeah, that's pretty good already. I think that custom IceWM-Setup 
> should
> also be mentioned under desktop environments. And there's more: Things
> like Dragora's release model (which is probably: fixed releases on a
> "when it's ready" basis) come to mind.

Yeah, we must link or include references (internal or external if 
necessary) on the Overview.

About Desktops, yes.  It could be something like:

Desktop environments:  Trinity Desktop (included by default)
                       DWM (included by default)
                       IceWM (available on dragora-extras)
                       dragora-ice - An own customization of IceWM 
(available on dragora-extras)

> > Package format: tlz
>
> Maybe it would be better to say a bit more about that because tlz is 
> not
> actually a "package format", like DEB or RPM, but a general archive
> format. So, maybe, saying "lzip-compressed tar archives (tlz)" would be
> better here.

Right, much better.

> I really need to find my notes on what to include in such a quick
> overview (for Dragora especially). Haven't been able to find them yet.
>
> We should probably put up a Git repository for the Dragora Handbook.
>
>
> --Michael