[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next? |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Oct 2007 07:50:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) |
Not as such. Max block size is set to the range 512 to 2048 depending
on file size. This works well for sparse changes in large files and
produces smaller increments, but larger sig files. I was proposing an
option for setting the max to something other than 2048.
...Ken
Fabiano Bonin wrote:
> Yes, is it already available?
>
> On 10/4/07, Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Fabiano Bonin wrote:
>>> Ken,
>>>
>>> Please consider to next versions to add a parameter for the admin to
>>> configure the rdiff block size to use.
>> OK. This is only a max block size for now. Is that what you want?
>>
>> ...Ken
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity S3 from Windows, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Ian Barton, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Ian Barton, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Fabiano Bonin, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Fabiano Bonin, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?,
Kenneth Loafman <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Fabiano Bonin, 2007/10/04
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Michael Baierl, 2007/10/03
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?, Till Maas, 2007/10/30