[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] R
From: |
Jacob |
Subject: |
Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:47:35 -0400 |
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:40:12 +0200
Peter Schuller <address@hidden> wrote:
> What are people's opinion - would this be a useful feature in general?
> If yes, I'll do a version that is documented and subject to a command
> line option. Otherwise for the one-off it doesn't matter.
>
My spam catcher must've got part of this thread. Would you mind re-stating the
feature in question?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/08/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Colin Ryan, 2008/08/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/08/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Colin Ryan, 2008/08/18
- gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, edgar . soldin, 2008/08/19
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Peter Schuller, 2008/08/19
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, edgar . soldin, 2008/08/20
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/08/20
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, edgar . soldin, 2008/08/20
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Peter Schuller, 2008/08/25
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?,
Jacob <=
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Edgar Soldin, 2008/08/26
- Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?, Jacob, 2008/08/27