[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources
From: |
Henrik Olsen |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:53:28 +0200 |
On Aug 14, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Henrik Olsen wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:02 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>>
>>> On 12.08.2010 13:21, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>>>> Jacob Godserv wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 17:25, Henrik
>>>>> Olsen<address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> As I'm still having the issue, I was wondering if GPG 1.4.10
>>>>>> could be the issue, and I should try 2.x instead?
>>>> There are still some interface changes that need to be made for
>>>> 2.x, but it might work.
>>> I recall having used duplicity together with gpg2 flawlessly.
>>> Worked for me.
>>
>> Trying with gpg2 now. Took a bit to get it to compile with the many
>> dependencies, but now duplicity can use it, as long as I change
>> self.call from gpg to gpg2 in GnuPGInterface.py.
>>
>> But... Unfortunately I still see a heavy ressource usage, exactly
>> like with gpg. Now with gpg2 as well, and as I noticed yesterday with
>> gpg, also even if only one process is running:
>>
>> ps aux | grep gpg root 98278 95.1 0.0 2436668 804 s000 RN+
>> 8:42PM 2:28.35 gpg2 --status-fd 5 --passphrase-fd 10 --logger-fd 3
>> --batch --no-tty --no-secmem-warning --decrypt holsen 98287 0.8
>> 0.0 2435036 528 s002 S+ 8:44PM 0:00.00 grep gpg
>>
>> On non-OSX usage, do anyone ever see gpg usage like this?
>
> Did gpg2 solve the issue of multiple gpg processes running? From your
> example, it looks like it did. If so, that was the issue that I was
> trying to solve. Every gpg process that is still open is tying up 3
> file descriptors and a very small amount of memory, but no CPU. With
> long chains of incrementals some people were running out of open files.
Is it possible that a particular backup can have been corrupted somehow,
causing an endless loop in gpg? I have doing incrementals on another user
account on the same machine, and here I do not see the problem. The one having
the issue has a long history, so I would not like to flush it and start all
over. Perhaps I should force a full backup? I already did multiple cleanup runs
with the force option.
/Henrik
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, edgar . soldin, 2010/08/09
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Henrik Olsen, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Henrik Olsen, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Jacob Godserv, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Kenneth Loafman, 2010/08/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, edgar . soldin, 2010/08/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Henrik Olsen, 2010/08/14
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Kenneth Loafman, 2010/08/14
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Henrik Olsen, 2010/08/14
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Henrik Olsen, 2010/08/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources,
Henrik Olsen <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: GPG taking many ressources, Henrik Olsen, 2010/08/13