[debbugs-tracker] bug#36230: closed ([PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 02 Jul 2019 17:58:17 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#36230] [PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36230,
regarding [PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
36230: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36230
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 20:34:30 +0000

0001-gnu-Add-emacs-multi-term.patch
Description: 0001-gnu-Add-emacs-multi-term.patch

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#36230] [PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 02 Jul 2019 17:58:17 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Baptiste Strazzulla <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > On the side, I `./pre-inst-env guix lint emacs-multi-term` the previous patch 
> > that you had to correct because I remembered doing it before posting and as 
> > it turned out, nothing came out. There doesn't seem to be any additional 
> > options I should give to `guix lint` so I don't understand exactly why you 
> > had a more rigorous linting than mine. Do you have an idea?
>
> We should both get the same ‘guix lint’ output.  :-)
>
> > From 9b8804a8fed18f77d72bb58113c823e3b29d7073 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Zzull <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 22:32:19 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-multi-term
> >
> > * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-multi-term): New variable
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---