[debbugs-tracker] bug#36190: closed (27.0.50; `put-text-property' etc. with buffer argument calls current buffer's `after-change-functions')

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 06 Jul 2019 19:22:32 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#36190: 27.0.50; `put-text-property' etc. with buffer 
argument calls current buffer's `after-change-functions'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36190,
regarding 27.0.50; `put-text-property' etc. with buffer argument calls current 
buffer's `after-change-functions'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
36190: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36190
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 27.0.50; `put-text-property' etc. with buffer argument calls current buffer's `after-change-functions'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:48:40 +0000
>
>
>
>
> In emacs -Q, evaluating:
>
> (let ((buffer1 (generate-new-buffer "A"))
>       (buffer2 (generate-new-buffer "B")))
>   (with-current-buffer buffer2
>     (insert "BBB"))
>   (with-current-buffer buffer1
>     (add-hook 'after-change-functions
>           (lambda (beg end len)
>         (message "%S %S %S"
>              beg end len))
>           nil t)
>     (put-text-property 1 4 'read-only t buffer2)))
>
> results in a "1 4 3" message. I would have expected no message, as
> buffer2 was modified and buffer1, whose after-change-functions I'd
> set, wasn't.
>
> I've looked at the code, and it appears no particular provisions are
> being made to make sure we switch to the modified buffer before
> calling signal_after_change().
>
> As far as I can tell, this makes `put-text-property' with a buffer
> argument pretty useless. Am I missing something? Is this expected
> behavior somehow?
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#36190: 27.0.50; `put-text-property' etc. with buffer argument calls current buffer's `after-change-functions'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 06 Jul 2019 19:22:32 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > From: Pip Cet <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 15:27:41 +0000
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > 
> > > LGTM, with a couple of minor comments below.  Feel free to push after
> > > fixing those.
> > 
> > I don't have push access, so I hope it's okay just to send the new patch.
>
> Thanks, pushed.  Please in the future mention the bug number in the
> log message, and be sure NOT to end with a period the header line of
> the log message, per CONTRIBUTE.
>
>
> --- End Message ---