--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
guix build --with-git-reference=… |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:24:33 +0200 |
Guix,
bricewge on #guix informed me that there's no way to pass a git
tag as source transformation option. Indeed:
‘--with-commit=PACKAGE=COMMIT’
This is similar to ‘--with-branch’, except that it builds
from
COMMIT rather than the tip of a branch. COMMIT must be a
valid Git
commit SHA1 identifier.
is quite different from (guix git-download)'s pleasantly liberal
notion of commit:
(git reference
(url "git://foo.org/fizbo")
(commit "fizbo-4.5")) ; tag yay
bricewge suggested that a single ‘--with-git-ref[erence]=’ could
replace both ‘--with-branch’ and a new ‘--with-tag’, and I agree.
(Although I prefer the full spelling, of course :-)
Two questions:
- Is this really not supported yet, or am I missing the obvious?
- Why is the (extremely) git-specific ‘--with-commit=’ option not
called ‘--with-git-commit=’? Was it intended to be more generic
than it is now? Should the new option be ‘--with-reference=’ as
well? That's pushing it a little far. And three questions in
one; I'm cheating.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#36371: guix build --with-git-reference=… |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:38:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> skribis:
> $ guix build guile-gcrypt --with-commit=guile-gcrypt=v1.0.0
> updating checkout of 'https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git'...
> guix build: error: cannot fetch commit v1.0.0 from
> https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git: unable to parse OID - contains
> invalid characters
>
> Internally, that uses the ‘git-checkout’ record type defined in (guix
> git).
>
> What I would propose is to change ‘git-checkout-compiler’ so that it can
> determine with a simple heuristic like that of (@@ (guix swh) commit-id?)
> whether the string denotes a commit ID or a tag.
Done in 177fecb57c0c9e15249bf6a49244c9dc6eb8439c.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---