bug#44966: closed ([PATCH] gnu: openocd: Fix build)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 01 Dec 2020 11:11:00 +0100
with message-id <87lfeh3kgb.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#44966] [PATCH] gnu: openocd: Fix build
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #44966,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: openocd: Fix build
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
44966: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44966
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] gnu: openocd: Fix build
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:20:04 -0500
>
>
>
>
> From: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com>
>
> * gnu/packages/embedded.scm (openocd)[arguments]: Add "LIBS=-lutil" to allow
> it to build
> ---
>
> So it turns out my pod doesn't need openocd so I'm not actually able to test
> this at all. But going from not building to building seems like an improvment
> in my eyes.
>
> ---
>  gnu/packages/embedded.scm | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/embedded.scm b/gnu/packages/embedded.scm
> index 73375a211d..baeb2e3e2a 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/embedded.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/embedded.scm
> @@ -555,7 +555,8 @@ language.")
>           ("libusb-compat" ,libusb-compat)))
>        (arguments
>         '(#:configure-flags
> -         (append (list "--disable-werror"
> +         (append (list "LIBS=-lutil"
> +                       "--disable-werror"
>                         "--enable-sysfsgpio"
>                         "--disable-internal-jimtcl"
>                         "--disable-internal-libjaylink")
> -- 
> 2.29.2
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#44966] [PATCH] gnu: openocd: Fix build
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 01 Dec 2020 11:11:00 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hey,
>
> > So it turns out my pod doesn't need openocd so I'm not actually able to test
> > this at all. But going from not building to building seems like an improvment
> > in my eyes.
>
> Pushed, thanks!
>
> Mathieu
>
>
> --- End Message ---