emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#38715: closed (Issue with guile-email: unbound variable)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#38715: closed (Issue with guile-email: unbound variable)
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 12:28:01 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:27:35 +0100
with message-id <87zh2r5dc8.fsf@elephly.net>
and subject line Re: bug#38715: Issue with guile-email: unbound variable
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38715,
regarding Issue with guile-email: unbound variable
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
38715: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38715
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Issue with guile-email: unbound variable Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 04:20:06 +0100
Hey guix,

Pretty recently, it seems something weird is happening when playing with
guix on the REPL.

On master, 5a947e118fb72b8fb1fd0c8d0b783fc7cde0c461:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix repl
> (use-modules (gnu packages gnupg))
While compiling expression:
error: guile-email: unbound variable.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Loading up the `(gnu packages mail)' module first seems to work around
the compilation error. My best guess is that this has something to do
with a circular reference between guile modules, but I am not certain on
how to easily debug (and fix) this.

- Jelle



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#38715: Issue with guile-email: unbound variable Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:27:35 +0100 User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
>
>>> Could it be that the reference to guile-email in the version field of
>>> mumimu created this issue?
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> (version (git-version (package-version guile-email) revision commit))
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> I also spotted this. It looks to me sort of like a copy/paste error, I'm
>> not sure why this variant of mu would take the version of the
>> guile-email package.
>
> This is a copy/paste error.  The origin of this expression is the
> guix.scm file of mumi.  Ludo then wrote a mumi service and copied the
> definition of mumimu from that guix.scm file.
>
> (package-version guile-email) is obviously wrong.  It should have been
> (package-version mu), because mumimu is a fork of mu.

I’m closing this now as mumi no longer depends on a fork of mu; instead
it uses guile-xapian with its own database.

-- 
Ricardo


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]