bug#45186: closed (Emacs master: build broken by spurious message ".../c-by.elc failed to provide feature `semantic/bovine/c-by")

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:31:35 +0000
with message-id <X9TUR+pPHCxRedFz@ACM>
and subject line Re: bug#45186: Emacs master: build broken by spurious message 
".../c-by.elc failed to provide feature `semantic/bovine/c-by"
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #45186,
regarding Emacs master: build broken by spurious message ".../c-by.elc failed 
to provide feature `semantic/bovine/c-by"
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
45186: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45186
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Emacs master: build broken by spurious message ".../c-by.elc failed to provide feature `semantic/bovine/c-by"
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:31:06 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Hello, Emacs.
>
> I've just updated a master repo here, and tried a make bootstrap.
>
> I get the error message:
>
>     cedet/semantic/bovine/c.el:35:1: Error: Loading file
>     /home/acm/emacs/emacs.git/sub-master-a/lisp/cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.elc
>     failed to provide feature `semantic/bovine/c-by'
>
> .  There is a perfectly good line at the end of this file:
>
>     (provide 'c-by)
>
> .  So what is expecting the compound symbol `semantic/bovine/c-by' to be
> provided, and why?
>
> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#45186: Emacs master: build broken by spurious message ".../c-by.elc failed to provide feature `semantic/bovine/c-by"
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:31:35 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Hello, Lars.
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 14:17:40 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> > Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
>
> > > Whoops, forgot about the actual bug.  It feels like there was an actual
> > > bug in make bootstrap here, but it's not obvious what.
>
> > It is somewhat surprising that "make bootstrap" removes less stuff than
> > "extraclean", I think?  People understandably get a bit confused about
> > all these "clean" levels, but I'm not sure what to do about it...
>
> > > Clearly the bug needs to be closed.  What do you think it is?  a
> > > notabug, a wontfix, or what?
>
> > Just a "close" with no other status, I think.  :-)
>
> OK.  This post is closing the bug.
>
> Thanks again for the help.
>
> > -- 
> > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
> >    bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
>
> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
>
>
> --- End Message ---