bug#33844: closed (Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:03:42 +0100
with message-id <86sg82slup.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33844,
regarding Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
33844: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33844
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:46:21 -0800
>
>
>
>
> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats.
>
> -- 
> Cheers 
> Swedebugia
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:03:42 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 at 17:27, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear,
> >
> > On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
> >> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >>>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch.
> >
> > The packages: …
> >
> >>>  - rapicorn
> >>>  - ganeti
> >>>  - manuskript
> >>>  - emacs-org-web-tools
> >>>  - emacs-ox-pandoc
> >>>  - ruby-pandoc-ruby
> >
> > … now uses ’pandoc’ instead of ’ghc-pandoc’, see:
> >
> > c22c6de453 gnu: rapicorn: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> > 885332832c gnu: ganeti: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> > 5dc5a3116b gnu: manuskript: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> > 991c61678b gnu: emacs-org-web-tools: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> > d37279ee1e gnu: emacs-ox-pandoc: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> > 8cc8e584ab gnu: ruby-pandoc-ruby: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> >
> >
> >> If these packages only use the “pandoc” executable they should use the
> >> “pandoc” package instead of “ghc-pandoc”.  “ghc-pandoc” is only meant
> >> for Haskell packages that use Pandoc as a library.  This is a much rarer
> >> case, so we can assume that most packages should use “pandoc” instead of
> >> “ghc-pandoc”.
> >
> > The only non-Haskell package remaining is ’gnu/packages/mail.scm
> > (muchsync)’.  Once this package is done (see #43848 [1]), we should be
> > able to close this bug, I guess.
>
> Done by <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43848#1>, see 8514dfdee6.
>
> Closing.
>
> Thanks,
> simon
>
>
> --- End Message ---