bug#24574: closed (emacs-module is not GPL compatible (Windows))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:47:44 -0700
with message-id 
<CADwFkm=OpBt7Sm9JDzMO1bJj7MXSZS2X_=TomBjEmK_kcktmfA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#24574: emacs-module is not GPL compatible (Windows)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24574,
regarding emacs-module is not GPL compatible (Windows)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
24574: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24574
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: emacs-module is not GPL compatible (Windows) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:17:11 +0000 (UTC)

Hi,

I build the emacs-sqlite3 project in Windows using MINGW (mingw64_shell.bat) and the following message appears when

I requiere the module:

sqlite3-core.dll is not GPL compatible

Questions: 

1. Have anybody tried to build this project in windows using MINGW or Visual Studio?

2. Do you have any idea about the error message: sqlite3-core.dll is not GPL compatible?

I found this project (sqlite3-core) more interesting/valuable for testing the new emacs-module than the default provided (mod-test) in emacs-25.1-src/modules

Repository: https://github.com/syohex/emacs-sqlite3

I also found and build a similar project https://github.com/thom-jenks/emacs-sqlite but unfortunately with the same problem: it is not GPL compatible

Thanks

Levis

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#24574: emacs-module is not GPL compatible (Windows)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:47:44 -0700
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Mambo Levis <mambo.levis@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 4:48 AM, "npostavs@users.sourceforge.net" 
> > <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >> So there is no bug after all?  Should we just close this report, or is
> >> there perhaps some guidance we should add to the documentation about how
> >> to build modules on Windows?
> [...]
> > Yes, in summary there is no bug after all, yes you can close it.
>
> Thanks, I read this thread and I can't see what we can add here besides
> the usual "fiddle with paths, put stuff where it belongs".
>
> So I'm closing this bug report.
>
>
> --- End Message ---