--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[patch] update glibc to 2.35 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 9 Apr 2022 22:16:31 -0300 (BRT) |
Hello! I have decided I wanted to work on updating glibc. I tested the updated
glibc with the packages ‘hello’, ‘coreutils’, ‘grep’, ‘sed’ and ‘guile’, and
they all built successfully!
I have attached the generated ‘git diff’ to this message, and I hope that is
fine. If there are any issues, please feel free to let me know!
glibc.diff
Description: Text Data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug#54832] [patch] update glibc to 2.35 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:32:56 +0200 |
Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com> skriver:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:14 PM zamfofex <zamfofex@twdb.moe> wrote:
>>
>> > There’s a comment at the top of ‘glibc-dl-cache.patch’ that explains
>> > what it does, but see
>> > <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2021/taming-the-stat-storm-with-a-loader-cache/>
>> > for details. I can take a look and update it.
>>
>> It seems we both misinterpreted the diff I had sent originally, as that
>> patch has not actually been removed, but rather its line was changed (it was
>> moved upwards). So good news, no need for changes or further investigation!
>
> I have used your patch to bootstrap with GCC 12 (in order to use both
> gcc-12 and llvm-14 in the same profile) and I have found that without
> "glibc-ldd-x86_64.patch", sometimes ldd will throw a "not a dynamic
> executable" error. I assume the powerpc patch is likewise still
> required.
I submitted a variant of this patch to #57533 that preserves
glibc-ldd-x86_64.patch.
Closing this issue, as it has been superseded by #57533.
Thanks zamfofex!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---