bug#52909: closed (Some man pages are not built correctly)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:25:16 -0400
with message-id <87bkr0y383.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#52909: Some man pages are not built correctly
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52909,
regarding Some man pages are not built correctly
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
52909: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52909
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Some man pages are not built correctly
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 30 Dec 2021 19:00:45 -0500
>
>
>
>
> On Guix Git commit c7d74a9bccfc1b1274fc8754a6e78bb6887c7fea, at least
> some manpages are not being built correctly for packages such as elogind
> and gnome-keyring-daemon. Are we seeing raw groff input? I'm not sure of
> the technology used here.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#52909: Some man pages are not built correctly
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:25:16 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> >
> >> On Guix Git commit c7d74a9bccfc1b1274fc8754a6e78bb6887c7fea, at least
> >> some manpages are not being built correctly for packages such as elogind
> >> and gnome-keyring-daemon. Are we seeing raw groff input? I'm not sure of
> >> the technology used here.
>
> [...]
>
> > I've read the same kind of issue reported to the bind9
> > project and its resolution, which was very helpful:
> > https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2310.  It seems it's
> > a DocBook XSL stylesheet problem resolved in
> > https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/pull/111 but not yet
> > released...
>
> This is now fixable in an ad-hoc fashion on master by replacing the
> problematic docbook-xsl with docbook-xsl-next, and fixed for good on
> core-updates.
>
> Closing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---