emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#63967: closed (28.2; switch-to-buffer in normal window fails if mini


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#63967: closed (28.2; switch-to-buffer in normal window fails if minibuffer window is active)
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 16:24:01 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2023 16:23:05 +0000
with message-id <ZI3d6SuSg3QzRlC0@ACM>
and subject line Re: bug#63967: 28.2; switch-to-buffer in normal window fails 
if minibuffer window is active
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #63967,
regarding 28.2; switch-to-buffer in normal window fails if minibuffer window is 
active
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
63967: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63967
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 28.2; switch-to-buffer in normal window fails if minibuffer window is active Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:32:56 -0400
While the minibuffer window is active, attempt to switch buffers in
an ordinary window like so:

emacs -Q
M-: (setq enable-recursive-minibuffers t) RET
M-x C-x o C-x b foo RET

In emacs 27 and earlier, that will switch the buffer in the main
window to the new buffer named "foo", but in emacs 28.2, it generates
a bogus "user-error: Cannot switch buffers in minibuffer window".

I get the same results with -nw.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#63967: 28.2; switch-to-buffer in normal window fails if minibuffer window is active Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 16:23:05 +0000
Hello, Martin and Eli.

On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 15:52:22 +0200, martin rudalics wrote:
>  > It's certainly a simple patch, and I think it's safe enough for Emacs
>  > 29.  Maybe other people (e.g. Martin) would be good enough to give it a
>  > quick going over before we commit it.

> I cannot see any problems with it.

Thanks, Martin.

I've now committed the patch to the emacs-29 branch, and I'm closing the
bug with this post.

> martin

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]