bug#64064: closed ([PATCH 0/4] debbugs improvements)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:40:34 +0200
with message-id <87r0q7zyq5.fsf@gmx.de>
and subject line Re: bug#64064: [PATCH 3/4] Don't sort bugs in 
'debbugs-gnu-show-reports'.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64064,
regarding [PATCH 0/4] debbugs improvements
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
64064: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64064
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/4] debbugs improvements Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 08:15:57 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Hello!

These patches enable the use of some more 'tabulated-list' functions
like 'tabulated-list-sort' (bound to "S").

You may or may not want to install the last patch.  It does add
potential network calls to the 'revert-buffer' function.  If there are
legitimate reasons to revert the buffer without fetching new bugs then
people might not like that change.

Morgan Smith (4):
  Call 'tabulated-list-print-entry' in 'debbugs-gnu-print-entry'.
  Don't error out on 'nil' alist value.
  Don't sort bugs in 'debbugs-gnu-show-reports'.
  Add 'debbugs-gnu-rescan' to 'tabulated-list-revert-hook'.

 debbugs-gnu.el | 62 +++++++++-----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
 

0001-Call-tabulated-list-print-entry-in-debbugs-gnu-print.patch
Description: Text Data

0002-Don-t-error-out-on-nil-alist-value.patch
Description: Text Data

0003-Don-t-sort-bugs-in-debbugs-gnu-show-reports.patch
Description: Text Data

0004-Add-debbugs-gnu-rescan-to-tabulated-list-revert-hook.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#64064: [PATCH 3/4] Don't sort bugs in 'debbugs-gnu-show-reports'.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:40:34 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com> writes:
>
> Hi Morgan,
>
> > To improve performance the next step should be making the network calls
> > asynchronously.  I thought this was a free performance boost but it is
> > not.  I have no plans to work on this.
>
> We're doing asynchronous bug fetching already. In `debbugs-get-status',
> several calls to `debbugs-soap-invoke-async' are fired in parallel,
> every call retrieving up to `debbugs-max-hits-per-request' bugs at once.
>
> I've also made some experiments with other improvements for asynchronous
> network calls, those attempts failed (some years ago). And here we are.
>
> Anyway, there's nothing left to do. I've released debbugs 0.36, closing
> this bug.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Morgan
>
> Best regards, Michael.
>
>
> --- End Message ---